The difference between a paid billing entry and a rejected one often comes down to five words: specificity, substantive language, and proper documentation. Vague entries like "phone call" or "research" trigger automatic rejections by carrier billing software. Precise entries explaining who, what, where, when, and why get paid.
1. Research (Legal Research & Analysis)
Insurers view pure research as potentially padding unless you show it directly advanced the case. Reframe research as "analysis of legal authority" — language that signals it's integral to strategy, not theoretical investigation.
Many carriers prohibit research entries exceeding 1 hour without prior written approval. They view pure research as work outside the litigation plan. Show the legal question you investigated, why it mattered to case strategy, and what work product resulted.
✅ Descriptions That Get Paid
| Billing Description | Why It Works | Approval Rate |
|---|---|---|
| "Analyzed [X] case authorities re: employment classification under state law; prepared summary memo for litigation strategy" | Quantifies scope, specific legal question, shows deliverable | 95%+ |
| "Examined published decisions re: products liability causation standard in [state]; developed core arguments for motion brief" | Shows depth, legal consequence, advance toward motion | 90%+ |
| "Researched [specific statutory provision]; reviewed regulatory guidance; prepared memo analyzing coverage implications" | Regulatory/coverage focus, clear deliverable | 90%+ |
| "Reviewed and compared precedent on contract interpretation re: [specific clause]; prepared outline for negotiation strategy" | Comparative analysis, business impact, advance to settlement | 88%+ |
| "Researched and analyzed case law re: statute of limitations defense; reviewed [X] decisions; summarized findings" | Specific issue, explains purpose, shows work product | 92%+ |
❌ Descriptions That Get Rejected
| Billing Description | Why Insurers Cut It | Cut Rate |
|---|---|---|
| "Legal research" | Too vague — insurer doesn't know what was researched or why | ~100% |
| "Research and analysis" | Lacks specificity; carrier software flags generic terms | 95%+ |
| "Reviewed case law" | No case focus or purpose stated; could be busywork | 80%+ |
| "Worked on motion" (with research component) | Bundled multiple tasks; block billing flag triggered | 70–80% |
| "Prepared legal memorandum" | Without describing the research underlying it | 65%+ |
Unlock the Full Glossary
You've seen the Research section — the part most attorneys already know. The rest is what actually moves the needle.
2. Correspondence (Client Communication & Coordination)
Insurers pay for substantive client interaction — decisions, approvals, analysis delivered — but not for administrative coordination or status updates. Pair every communication entry with its business purpose.
If an entry sounds like "checking in," it will be cut. If it sounds like "providing legal advice or moving a discrete task forward," it gets paid. The adjuster name and title should always appear — it shows authorization and business purpose.
✅ Descriptions That Get Paid
| Billing Description | Why It Works | Approval Rate |
|---|---|---|
| "Telephone conference with claims adjuster [Name, Title] re: litigation strategy for [specific motion]; discussed [topic]; advised re: [recommendation]" | Identifies who, purpose, business outcome, value-add | 95%+ |
| "Email correspondence with client re: [specific decision/approval needed]; provided analysis of [options A/B]; requested written authorization for [action]" | Shows value-add, documents decision request | 93%+ |
| "Conference call with client re: settlement demand ($X); provided risk assessment; discussed trial costs vs. settlement value" | Analysis paired with communication, shows counsel value | 92%+ |
| "Scheduled deposition of [witness]; coordinated timing with client adjuster and opposing counsel; confirmed notice requirements" | Specific tasks, moves case forward | 90%+ |
❌ Descriptions That Get Rejected
| Billing Description | Why Insurers Cut It | Cut Rate |
|---|---|---|
| "Phone call" | Vague — insurer doesn't know who, what, or why | ~100% |
| "Spoke with adjuster" | Missing details — looks like administrative task | 90%+ |
| "Talked to other associates" | Not attorney work — non-billable internal task | ~100% |
| "Client communication" | No substance shown — appears status-only | 75%+ |
| "Conference with partner" (no specifics) | Internal meeting — often non-billable to insurer | 80%+ |
3. Drafting (Motions, Briefs & Discovery Documents)
Insurers police drafting time aggressively because it's easy to overbill. Your narrative must quantify the deliverable and show the legal theory — what legal principle did you brief?
Insurers can't objectively assess whether a 5-hour brief should have taken 3 hours. Quantify the deliverable (page count, number of counts, complexity level) and show the legal theory — what legal principle did you brief?
✅ Descriptions That Get Paid
| Billing Description | Why It Works | Approval Rate |
|---|---|---|
| "Drafted motion for summary judgment re: [specific issue]; researched supporting case law; prepared [X]-page brief and supporting declaration" | Specific document, quantified scope, substantive work shown | 95%+ |
| "Prepared responsive interrogatory answers re: [topic area]; reviewed discovery demands; drafted [X] responses; coordinated with client" | Specific scope, client coordination shown | 92%+ |
| "Continued drafting MTD section re: [statute of limitations/immunity issue]; incorporated case law analysis; revised based on client feedback" | "Continued" signals incremental progress; specific legal theory | 88%+ |
| "Drafted trial brief on [specific legal theory]; analyzed controlling precedent; prepared [X]-page brief with [X] supporting authorities" | Quantifies deliverable, shows scope | 90%+ |
| "Drafted complaint/answer with [X] counts; incorporated allegations re: [specific claims]; coordinated factual allegations with client" | Scope clear, client coordination shown | 87%+ |
❌ Descriptions That Get Rejected
| Billing Description | Why Insurers Cut It | Cut Rate |
|---|---|---|
| "Draft motion" | No specifics — could take 1 hour or 8 hours | 85%+ |
| "Revise brief" | Carrier software interprets as "proofreading" — paralegal work | 75%+ |
| "Work on motion and research" | Block billing — "and" = red flag for bundled tasks | 90%+ |
| "Prepared legal memorandum" | Without describing deliverable length or legal conclusion | 60%+ |
| "Edited document" | Sounds like clerical work, not attorney work | 95%+ |
4. Document Review (Records, Discovery & Deposition Materials)
Document review is the #1 battleground in insurance defense billing. Insurers use formulaic hour allowances and cut entries that exceed their benchmark. Survive the audit by quantifying volume, explaining your analysis, and showing the work product.
Insurers often benchmark document review at ~0.5 hours per 100 pages. "Reviewed medical records" will be cut to 0.2 hours. "Reviewed 487 pages of medical records; prepared chronology of treatment from [date] to [date]; identified key diagnostic findings" will be paid in full.
Never use block billing for document review. Break it into small, separate entries with specific focus areas. "Reviewed pages 1-100 of medical records; focused on [condition]" + "Reviewed pages 101-200; focused on [different clinical issue]" = harder to cut than one 3-hour entry.
✅ Descriptions That Get Paid
| Billing Description | Why It Works | Approval Rate |
|---|---|---|
| "Reviewed and indexed [X] pages of medical records; prepared chronology of [topic]; identified [X] key treatment dates; highlighted inconsistencies re: causation" | Quantifies volume, explains analysis, shows value-add | 92%+ |
| "Examined [X] deposition pages of [witness name]; analyzed testimony re: [specific claim]; prepared memo identifying inconsistencies with [other evidence]" | Specific witness, specific legal relevance | 90%+ |
| "Reviewed discovery documents re: [topic]; prepared privilege log and withheld [X] documents; identified responsive vs. non-responsive materials" | Specific task, business output shown | 88%+ |
| "Analyzed [X] pages of contract/policy language; reviewed regulatory guidance; prepared interpretation memo addressing [disputed provision]" | Specific documents, legal output, business purpose | 89%+ |
| "Prepared deposition binder for [witness]; reviewed [X] documents; created tab system; prepared outline of key topics" | Clear prep task, specific outcome | 85%+ |
❌ Descriptions That Get Rejected
| Billing Description | Why Insurers Cut It | Cut Rate |
|---|---|---|
| "Reviewed medical records" | No quantification — could be 30 minutes or 10 hours | 85%+ |
| "Block billing: reviewed medical records and prepared deposition outline; 3.5 hours" | Bundled task — insurer can't assess reasonableness; automatic cut | ~100% |
| "Reviewed discovery" | Too broad — what was reviewed? What did you produce? | 80%+ |
| "Prepared for deposition" | Vague prep work — insurer wants specificity | 75%+ |
| "Document review and analysis" | Generic — lacks specific documents or legal relevance | 70%+ |
5. Travel (Court Appearances, Depositions & Client Meetings)
Travel time is one of the most reliably paid billing categories. When documented properly — destination, purpose, duration — “en route” entries are virtually never rejected. Use the templates below and you’re in good shape.
Separate travel time from the appearance/meeting itself. Don't say "drove to and attended deposition (4 hours total)." Say "En route to [location]: 2.5 hours. Deposition appearance: 1.5 hours." Carriers are more likely to pay actual court time.
✅ Descriptions That Get Paid
| Billing Description | Why It Works | Approval Rate |
|---|---|---|
| "En route to [location] for deposition of [witness] on [date]; [X] hours drive/fly time; appeared and defended deposition [X:XX–X:XX]" | Location, purpose, duration all documented | 95%+ |
| "En route to [courthouse]; [X] miles; appeared for [motion hearing/trial]; [duration]" | Mileage documented, court appearance, duration clear | 90%+ |
| "En route to in-person client meeting with claims adjuster [Name] re: [purpose] on [date]; [X] hours" | Specific meeting purpose, adjuster name, date | 85%+ |
| "En route to trial on [dates]; [X] miles; [duration] each direction; trial appearance [duration/dates]" | Separate travel entries paired with court event | 92%+ |
When documented properly — destination, purpose, duration — “en route” entries consistently clear at 85–95%+ rates. The templates above are your go-to formats. Insurers rarely challenge travel time when it’s properly itemized.
❌ Descriptions That Get Rejected
| Billing Description | Why Insurers Cut It | Cut Rate |
|---|---|---|
| "Mileage" (without supporting documentation) | No receipts or route documentation | 70%+ |
| "Rental car" (no business purpose) | Insurer can't verify necessity | 50%+ |
Track time with descriptions that get paid
BillZero makes it easy to enter time with the right language — every entry, every time.
Universal Rules: What Gets You Paid
What Gets You Paid Across All Categories
✅ Always Include
❌ Never Write
Formatting Rules: The Technical Gauntlet
To pass through automated insurer billing software, your entries must follow these format rules. The software rejects entries at the syntax level — before a human ever reviews them.
Formatting Rules: The Technical Gauntlet
✅ Approved Format
❌ Rejected Format
UTBMS Codes: The Legal Alphabet
Insurance carriers require UTBMS task codes (Uniform Task-Based Management System). Use these to align your narrative with the approved code — the entry language should mirror the code's description.
| Code | Task | Risky Narrative | Safe Alternative |
|---|---|---|---|
| L310 | Legal Research & Analysis | "Researched" | "Analyzed legal authority re:…"; "Examined case law regarding…" |
| L320 | Document Drafting | "Drafted"; "Wrote" | "Drafted [specific document] re: [specific issue]" |
| L330 | Document Review | "Reviewed files" | "Reviewed [X] pages of [document type]; prepared [output]" |
| A106 | Client Communication | "Called client" | "Telephone conference with [Name] re: [specific topic]" |
| A107 | Adversary Communication | "Talked to other side" | "Correspondence with opposing counsel re: [topic]" |
Real-World Audit Outcomes
Insurance Company Billing Patterns
Know who you're billing. Carriers have different tolerance levels — knowing which ones are strict lets you calibrate your entries before submission.
🔴 Strictest on Billing
🟡 Moderate Flexibility
Pre-Submission Checklist
Before submitting invoices to insurance carriers, run through this checklist to avoid rejections. Every check is a line item that survives the audit.
- Every entry contains WHO, WHAT, WHERE (if applicable), and WHY
- No vague entries ("phone call," "research," "worked on file")
- No bundled tasks — each entry = one discrete activity
- No "and" statements — split into separate entries
- Quantification where applicable (pages, document length, mileage)
- UTBMS codes aligned with narrative (L310 = research, L320 = drafting, L330 = review)
- Internal meetings documented only when advancing case strategy
- Travel separately itemized from court/deposition appearances
- Timekeepers properly identified (name + role)
- Formatting clean — no semicolons, no excessive punctuation, consistent tense
Sources & Authority
Sources & Authority
- Published Carrier Guidelines: The Hartford Billing Guidelines, DRI (Defense Research Institute) Recommended Guidelines, PRISM Risk Guidelines, Verus Underwriting Guidelines
- Bar Association Standards: New York State Bar Opinion 716 (Billing Audits), Georgia Bar Opinion 99-R2, ABA Formal Opinion 01-421, Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 93-5
- Industry Analysis: LeanLaw Legal Billing Analysis (1,000+ rejected invoices), UTBMS Codes (ABA-endorsed standard), LEDES Billing Format Standards
- Attorney Forum Intelligence: Reddit r/LawFirm, r/Lawyertalk (100+ threads on rejected line items), Insurance Journal, Smokeball, CaseGlide, PageLightPrime
Write descriptions that survive the software filter
The solution isn't to appeal every cut — it's to write descriptions that get through in the first place. Specific = Paid. Vague = Cut.
Start Tracking Time →